Buy Cars and Trucks in Jackson, Missouri

Dodge : Ram 1500 ST 2008 Dodge Ram 1500 Reg Cab V6 6spd Manual 2WD
 Dodge : Ram 1500 ST 2008 Dodge Ram 1500 Reg Cab V6 6spd Manual 2WD
$5,100.00 (15 Bids)
Time Left: 4h 50m
Porsche : Cayman cayman s 2007 porsche cayman S 39k miles like porsche 911
 Porsche : Cayman cayman s 2007 porsche cayman S 39k miles like porsche 911
$19,100.00
$26,000.00
Time Left: 5h 32m
Dodge : Ram 2500 SLT 2006 DODGE 2500 QUAD CAB SHORT BED 4X4 5.9L CUMMINS DIESEL AUTO SLT LOADED NICE
 Dodge : Ram 2500 SLT 2006 DODGE 2500 QUAD CAB SHORT BED 4X4 5.9L CUMMINS DIESEL AUTO SLT LOADED NICE
$18,100.00 (6 Bids)
Time Left: 22h 48m
Chevrolet : Tahoe LTZ Chevy Tahoe LTZ 2007
 Chevrolet : Tahoe LTZ Chevy Tahoe LTZ 2007
$17,500.00 (6 Bids)
Time Left: 1d 19h 41m
Pontiac : G8 GT 2009 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, Leather, Sunroof
 Pontiac : G8 GT 2009 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, Leather, Sunroof
$21,500.00 (0 Bids)
Time Left: 2d 10h 4m
GMC : Terrain SLE-2 2010 GMC Terrain SLE-2 - LOWER PRICE - $23000 or Make Offer
 GMC : Terrain SLE-2 2010 GMC Terrain SLE-2 - LOWER PRICE - $23000 or Make Offer
$23,000.00 (0 Bids)
Time Left: 2d 23h 3m
Mercedes-Benz : SL-Class AMG 2001 Mercedes SL500 convertible
 Mercedes-Benz : SL-Class AMG 2001 Mercedes SL500 convertible
$15,000.00 (0 Bids)
Time Left: 3d 4h 25m
Honda : Odyssey 2000 Honda Odyssey Mini Van -Power Sliding Doors-
 Honda : Odyssey 2000 Honda Odyssey Mini Van -Power Sliding Doors-
$3,999.00 (0 Bids)
Time Left: 3d 11h 4m
Ford : E-Series Van Heavy Half 2009 Ford E-150 One Driver Owned
 Ford : E-Series Van Heavy Half 2009 Ford E-150 One Driver Owned
$9,500.00 (0 Bids)
Time Left: 3d 19h 51m
Chevrolet : Uplander 4DR REG WB L DVD Video System Dealer trade Smoke free Clean Excellent condition
 Chevrolet : Uplander 4DR REG WB L DVD Video System Dealer trade Smoke free Clean Excellent condition
$5,000.00 (13 Bids)
Time Left: 4d 9h 4m
Ford : F-150 2000 Ford F150 2x4 *One Owner*
 Ford : F-150 2000 Ford F150 2x4 *One Owner*
$5,000.00 (0 Bids)
Time Left: 4d 9h 11m
Honda : Civic EX 99 Honda Civic Ex Turbed 1.6L, Turbonectics, Garrett, TurboXS, Steelies, 32 MPG
 Honda : Civic EX 99 Honda Civic Ex Turbed 1.6L, Turbonectics, Garrett, TurboXS, Steelies, 32 MPG
$3,800.00 (0 Bids)
Time Left: 4d 9h 39m
Chevrolet : Chevelle Malibu 1972 Chevelle Malibu 350 Transformer Tribute Chevrolet May Trade
 Chevrolet : Chevelle Malibu 1972 Chevelle Malibu 350 Transformer Tribute Chevrolet May Trade
$1,525.00 (4 Bids)
Time Left: 6d 9h 10m
Jaguar : XF 2009 Jaguar XF Loaded Low Miles Most desired Color Combo
 Jaguar : XF 2009 Jaguar XF Loaded Low Miles Most desired Color Combo
$29,900.00
Time Left: 13d 6h 22m
Chevrolet : C K Pickup 3500 1984 Chevy Pickup 4x4 1 ton Wrecker Tow Truck Big Block
 Chevrolet : C K Pickup 3500 1984 Chevy Pickup 4x4 1 ton Wrecker Tow Truck Big Block
$8,500.00
Time Left: 14d 23h 22m
Chevrolet : Camaro SS ProStreet 98 Camaro SS Pro Street 6.0 Supercharged, Pro Charger, 40k invested, high HP
 Chevrolet : Camaro SS ProStreet 98 Camaro SS Pro Street 6.0 Supercharged, Pro Charger, 40k invested, high HP
$17,000.00
Time Left: 17d 1h 13m

Sponsored Links


Questions Related to jackson, missouri cars

Provided By Y! Answers

I moved to a different county in Missouri. How do I set it up to pay my property tax for my cars?
Question:
I need to switch things from my old Jackson county property tax address to my new Miller county address.

Answer:
You'll pay the tax to Jackson County for 2009. The tax is assessed by the county where the vehicle was garaged on Jan 1st. Stop by the tax collectors office in Miller County and give them your details. They can probably give you a 2010 assessment form and complete it on-the-spot. If the 2010 forms are not ready yet, they'll add you to the mailing list and send you the form shortly after the new year. Be sure to return it by the deadline (Mar 15?) to avoid penalties for late assessment. If you get an assessment form from Jackson County, send it back uncompleted with a note that you have moved to Miller County. This isn't strictly necessary but will help them keep their records up-to-date.

What is the standard error of the sample proportion?
Question:
An environmental research firm wants to estimate the proportion of cars in Jackson County Missouri that would be considered SUV's. Using the county's vehicle registration records they randomly select 220 vehicles. From that list they determined that 98 of them were SUV's. I will be sure to pick a best answer, thanks.

Answer:
The standard error for proportion is a measure of the spread of the distribution. For example in this case 98 out of n=220 vehicles means p= 45% of the vehicles are SUVs. SEprop = sqrt [(p)(1-p) / n ] SEprop = sqrt(.45*.55/220) = 3%

what the heck kinda bird did we see!?
Question:
ok. so.. yesterday going home after shopping.. my friend and i saw something very rare sweeping down towards cars. the best details i can describe it as.. well.. because it got so close it almost landed on the car. like it was a threat.. ok.. massive wing span.. bat shaped wings, light tan skin. no fur, no feathers.. long neck.. very tiny legs and claws.. didn't see any arms.. had the belly of a rubber chicken.. may i also add i live in jackson missouri.. the car in front of us was almost gotten attacked first.. then it tried us next. as it passed by.. it circled around getting back on the road.. both me and my friend who's a family friend who helps me around my apartment. and gives me rides. shes paid to do this stuff of course. her and i both think we saw a baby Pterodactyl.. crazy.. i know.. no such thing these days.. but i'm serious.. what bird looks like a Pterodactyl? it had no fur, no feathers. it was just skin.. light tan skin.. her and i saw the same thing and pretty much thought it was a baby Pterodactyl that likes to swing towards cars.. it was flying around in the country part on the way home from cape girardeau it likes to fly pretty low.. unlike most birds i've seen that are larger then a eagle it could glide with the wind. like a kite. didn't even need to flap its wings hardly at all. it was one with the air/wind. it sucks because i know no one will believe us.. thats how it works anyways right? you get to see the rarest sight and people think you are crazy. thats why i'm asking. what did she and i see? and may i add it has absolutely no fear of vehicles.. either space is definately taking effect on change. or theres a bird i never seen befor.. so freakin massive wings.. i'm so glad i'm not the only one to see it then.. there be a reason for me to see it though. always obsessed on going on a grand adventure, and i like dinosaurs. but even a mind can't get that powerful, right? plus the fact i wasn't the only one who saw it.. well, reason why i say my brain. is because i have a massive amounts of imagination. even my dreams i can feel everything and make a story.. because i remember everything.. like.. 5months ago i dreamed about these people with cleavers. one of them was outside talking on a cellphone. telling him to tell me write down and remember GA2. after a while i wake up and type it in on google.. and found this.. Glutaric Acidemia II (GA2) wouldn't be the first time i dream about something that's infomational.. and real places.. that i see later on down the road of life.

Answer:
You aren't crazy - I saw the same thing on a drive through northern Missouri last year, and I have read two other accounts of the same thing (both in Missouri). Now, personally, I believe it was a blue heron. But honestly, it didn't look like a heron to me - it looked like a Rhamphorhynchus: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhamphorhynchus_(animal) Here is a guy who saw the same thing: http://www.cryptozoology.com/sightings/sightings_show.php?id=2394 I was driving down the road in the early morning, no other cars around. This thing flew out of the trees on the left and into the trees on the right. I almost ran off the road looking at it, and when I got to my hotel room I drew a picture of it so I could show my friends and family. You're right, though - no one will believe you! I don't know how much the mind has to do with it. I'm a natural-born skeptic, I don't believe in yetis, bigfoots, ghosts, or the Loch Ness Monster, and I'm not the least bit interested in dinosaurs.

Easy Statistics Question? First Answer Points?
Question:
An environmental research firm wants to estimate the proportion of cars in Jackson County Missouri that would be considered SUV's. Using the county's vehicle registration records they randomly select 250 vehicles. From that list they determined that 96 of them were SUV's. a)Find the standard error of the sample proportion in this situation. b)From this data we see that we are 95% confident that the true proportion of SUVs in Jackson County Missouri is between _____and ________

Answer:
p=96/250 = 0.384 a) SE(p) = √(p(1-p)/n) = √(0.384*(1-0.384)/250) = 0.0308 b) The interval of 95% of confidence is p ± z(1-alpha/2)*SE(p) for 95% --> alpha=0.05 --> Z(1-0.05/2) = Z(0.975) --> P(Z z=1.96 0.384 ± 1.96*0.0308 0.384 ± 0.0604 (0.384 - 0.0604 , 0.384 + 0.0604) (0.3236 , 0.4444)

Homework Help for Statistics Class (Sampling Distributions and Confidence Intervals)?
Question:
I`m having the hardest time remembering how to do this problem: An environmental research firm wants to estimate the proportion of cars in Jackson County Missouri that would be considered SUV's. Using the county's vehicle registration records they randomly select 230 vehicles. From that list they determined that 89 of them were SUV's. Note: Report your answers to 4 decimal places. Find the standard error of the sample proportion in this situation. From this data we see that we are 98% confident that the true proportion of SUVs in Jackson County Missouri is between ___ and ___.

Answer:
Sample proportion of cars in Jackson County Missouri that would be considered SUV's = ^p = 89/230 Since both n*^p=230*(89/230)=89 and n*(1-^p)=230*[1-(89/230)]=141 are both at least greater than 5 , then n is considered to be large and so the sampling distribution of the sample proportion ^p is approximately a normal distribution and hence it is appropriate to describe the above probability distribution using the z score in this case. Standard error of the sample proportion in this situation =√[^p(1-^p)/(n-1)] =√{(89/230)*[1-(89/230)]/(230- 1)} = 0.032 Given our confidence level = 98% i.e., 100(1-α)% = 98% 100(1-α) = 98 1-α = 98/100 1-α = 0.98 -α = 0.98-1 -α = -0.02 α = 0.02 So, a 98% confidence interval for the true proportion of SUV's in Jackson County Missouri = {^p (+-) Z(α/2)*√[^p(1-^p)/(n-1)]} = {(89/230) (+-) Z(0.02/2)*√[(89/230)[(1-(89/230)]/(230-1)]} = {(89/230) (+-) 2.33*√[(89/230)*(141/230)/229]} = [0.385, 0.462] Therefore, from this data we see that we are 98% confident that the true proportion of SUVs in Jackson County Missouri is between 0.385 and 0.462. Hope this helps.

Statistics Confidence Interval?!?
Question:
An environmental research firm wants to estimate the proportion of cars in Jackson County Missouri that would be considered SUV's. Using the county's vehicle registration records they randomly select 220 vehicles. From that list they determined that 90 of them were SUV's. The sample proportion is 0.409, and the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of cars in Jackson County that are SUV's is: (0.344, 0.474). Which of the following statements are true? Select all that apply. Choose at least one answer. a. If you created a 90% confidence interval instead of the 95% confidence interval it would decrease the margin of error in the interval above. b. If you had a random sample of 98 vehicles instead of 220 it would decrease the margin of error in the interval above. c. If you created a 99% confidence interval instead of the 95% confidence interval it would decrease the margin of error in the interval above. d. If you had a random sample of 320 vehicles instead of 220 it would decrease the margin of error in the interval above. e. If you created a 90% confidence interval instead of the 95% confidence interval it would increase the margin of error in the interval above. f. If you had a random sample of 98 vehicles instead of 220 it would increase the margin of error in the interval above. g. If you created a 99% confidence interval instead of the 95% confidence interval it would increase the margin of error in the interval above. h. If you had a random sample of 320 vehicles instead of 220 it would increase the margin of error in the interval above. i. If you created a 90% confidence interval instead of the 95% confidence interval the margin of error would stay the same. j. If you had a random sample of 98 vehicles instead of 220 the margin of error would stay the same.

Answer:

Statistics Confidence Interval Problem?
Question:
An environmental research firm wants to estimate the proportion of cars in Jackson County Missouri that would be considered SUV's. Using the county's vehicle registration records they randomly select 220 vehicles. From that list they determined that 90 of them were SUV's. The sample proportion is 0.409, and the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of cars in Jackson County that are SUV's is: (0.344, 0.474). Which of the following statements are true? Select all that apply. Choose at least one answer. a. If you created a 90% confidence interval instead of the 95% confidence interval it would decrease the margin of error in the interval above. b. If you had a random sample of 98 vehicles instead of 220 it would decrease the margin of error in the interval above. c. If you created a 99% confidence interval instead of the 95% confidence interval it would decrease the margin of error in the interval above. d. If you had a random sample of 320 vehicles instead of 220 it would decrease the margin of error in the interval above. e. If you created a 90% confidence interval instead of the 95% confidence interval it would increase the margin of error in the interval above. f. If you had a random sample of 98 vehicles instead of 220 it would increase the margin of error in the interval above. g. If you created a 99% confidence interval instead of the 95% confidence interval it would increase the margin of error in the interval above. h. If you had a random sample of 320 vehicles instead of 220 it would increase the margin of error in the interval above. i. If you created a 90% confidence interval instead of the 95% confidence interval the margin of error would stay the same. j. If you had a random sample of 98 vehicles instead of 220 the margin of error would stay the same.

Answer:
a d f g are true the rest is not true

Missouri’s “Castle Doctrine” Law Under Scrutiny?
Question:
Im 12 years Old and I think this is a great law. Missouri’s “castle doctrine” law, passed last year, continues to draw controversy and debate even as property owners use it to defend themselves and what they own. The castle doctrine law allows Missourians to use deadly force when necessary to defend themselves from attackers. Advocates praise the measure as a means for innocent people to defend themselves against criminals. But critics of the law fear it could result in the unnecessary deaths of petty thieves and that hardened criminals could hide behind the act as a legal way of killing others. Officials question just how far people can go when someone enters their home and they are looking to court cases to help sort out the interpretations. Judges and attorneys familiar with the law say that Missouri’s version appears to allow killings like one that happened in Texas last November where a man saw two burglars carrying items from his neighbor’s house, then grabbed a shotgun and killed the burglars. The Missouri statute appears to legalize the killing of anyone who unlawfully enters a house or a car, or who commits a forcible felony like robbery, burglary, arson, kidnapping, assault or rape. But a committee working on jury instructions for the law is taking a somewhat more narrow approach. Jackson County Judge Charles Atwell, who chairs the committee, said the previous Missouri law had a “reasonableness” standard in it and feels that, since the new law uses the term “reasonable,” juries should take the standard into account. The “reasonableness” standard from the old law meant that a person had to believe they or another individual was in serious danger before deadly force could be used. Those jury instructions could prove pivotal, according to prosecutors in the state. They are due to be completed in the next month or so and are then subject to acceptance by the Missouri Supreme Court. Last week, a pizza deliveryman in Pagedale, a St. Louis suburb, was robbed at gunpoint when he brought a pizza to Rodney Reese and Brian Smith after they had called in the order. The pizza deliveryman, fearing for his life, fired his own gun, killing Smith. Reese was able to get away with the pizzas and the deliveryman’s wallet but was apprehended later. Reese is being held on $250,000 bond on armed criminal action, robbery and second-degree murder charges. The same day, Henry Brown was shot and killed when he tried breaking into an apartment in Columbia. Officials there said that the shooter, Alvin Canton, clearly acted in self-defense and is protected under the castle doctrine law.

Answer:
Check out the Wikipedia article on Castle Doctrine. I don't know how the Missouri law actually reads, but, generally, the castle doctrine laws allow the home owner to consider an intruder in their home a deadly threat and allows the use of deadly force. The law protects the home owner against both criminal and civil charges. The fellow in Texas does not really fall under the protection of the Castle Doctrine because it was not his property nor was it his home that was invaded. He might get off simply because Texans don't much like criminals anyway. The pizza delivery incident does not fall under the castle doctrine at all. This was simply a case of self defense against two armed robbers. The Henry Brown incident is the only one you quote that actually would fall under the Castle Doctrine.

What is up with governors of new jersey!?
Question:
Now, you know me as a very rationalist type of person, not prone to belief in superstitions, but I am convinced that someone has placed a curse on all governors of the State of New Jersey. The last governor of NJ who actually served out his full term was James Florio who served from '90-'94. His successor Christine Todd Whitman served till '01 when she decided to leave her post and accept President Bush's appointment as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. What followed were no less that four acting governors for the years '01 and '02 alone. Jim Mcgreevy's ascension to power was thought to have finally brought some stability to the post untill the whole 'feygalah' affair broke which cut his career short. and now this: CAMDEN, NJ | New Jersey Gov. Jon S. Corzine was in critical condition Friday but expected to recover after his SUV crashed into a guard rail while heading to a meeting between Don Imus and the Rutgers women's basketball team. 3 consecutive elected New Jersey governors break legs WLBT 3-Jackson Missouri ----- TRENTON, N.J. The last three people elected to serve as governor of New Jersey now share a similar fate. They've all broken a leg while in office. Current governor Jon Corzine became the latest victim last night. He is suffering from a broken left leg and a number of other injures from a car crash. Corzine is hospitalized in critical but stable condition. The person elected before him, James McGreevey, broke his left leg in 2002. He was taking a nighttime stroll along a beach with his wife. And in 1999, then-governor Christie Whitman broke both bones in the lower part of her right leg while skiing in the Alps. ----

Answer:
They are not sedantary like other governers. Although, corzine is SO DUMB for not wearing a seatbelt. THAT BLOWS MY MIND. esp. since a statetrooper was driving him.

One persons word against another?
Question:
About 6 or 7 years ago my husbands mistress (don't get me started) asked my husband to go to the store to pick up some items. He gets in the car and the mistress 15 or 16 year old daughter (at that time, she is now 22) comes out and gives him some money and tells him her mom wants some vodka. My husband goes to the store, gets the items, returns to her house, puts the items on the table and leaves the room. The daughter and her friend (same age) take the vodka to the friends house where they proceed to get so drunk that the friend gets alcohol poisoning and has to go to the hospital (she is ok now). I don't know what the girls told the friends mother about where the vodka came from. Now my husband wants to get away from the psycho b@^*^$ mistress and she is telling him that if he leaves her she will tell the mother of the girl with alcohol poisoning that he knowingly bought the vodka for the girls. As far as I know it is one persons word against the other but still it is disconcerting. If there are any real attorneys (this happened in Johnson County Kansas and we live in Jackson County Missouri) I would be most grateful for some advice and for any other person who wants to comment, please we have been through enough, I don't need to hear that I should leave him, or that's what he deserves or anything else, thank you very much. I'm asking if anyone really knows the statute of limitation on a case such as this and if there could be lawsuits from the daughters friends mother if the mistress does lie and says my husband did knowingly buy the liquor for the girls.

Answer:
First and foremost, I tend to believe that your husband knew full good and well that he was buying the alcohol for the teenage daughter. Secondly, the statute of limitations has tolled on an incident that happened six or seven years ago. Since the girl didn't die and apparently did not suffer any permanent injury, there is nothing that anyone is going to do about this. My advice would be for your husband to tell the mistress that he doesn't know what she is talking about but that if she spreads lies about him for the purpose of damaging his reputation that he will speak to an attorney about pursuing a cause of action against her for defamation of character. (This is a total bluff, but it might be enough to get her to go away.)